Below are web sites worth your time if you served in Guam, Thailand, off shore Vietnam, other places, etc and claim exposure to Agent orange.. spend some time going thru the links.. print out anything helpful to your claim.... pass this on to your lists...
ALSO SEE THE VETERANS PAGE! MUCH MORE INFORMATION! From: John Rossie www.bluewaternavy.org On the July 1 entry at http://bluewaternavy.org/claims/claims.htm there are the first 2 pages (image scans) of a case won at the Regional Level in Louisville, KY of a vet for Agent Orange cancer benefits. I hope to have page three, which should show some of the "reasoning" for this decision, posted very soon. Please stay tuned,
John Rossie www.bluewaternavy.org http://bluewaternavy.org/claims/claims.htm 1 Aug 06 - Added the .pdf file of VA GUIDE TO FILING AGENT ORANGE CLAIMS. This is an important document to be familiar with. Additional information and notes have been added following the VA guide in this same .pdf file. Read it ALL !!! Find it HERE. It includes information on filing AO claims EVEN IF YOU WERE NOT ON VIETNAMESE SOIL... very important to off shore Blue Water Navy activities. http://bluewaternavy.org/claims/2-VA%20Guide%20on%20Agent%20Orange%20Claims1.pdf brief of contents Applying For a VA Claim AndThe Importance of VA Laws VA Guide on Agent Orange Exposure To Include Provision Provided for Veterans Having Served In Locations Outside of Vietnam And VA Warms Manual Benefits Information Under Book B Rating Schedules Under Book C M-21 Provisions Governing Specific Consideration on Behalf of the Veteran Book B 3.102 3.304 and 3.350 also see: http://bluewaternavy.org/claims/nvlspwriteup.htm partial reprint: We suggest that if you have an adverse finding of Vietnam service, you file a Notice of Disagreement and Substantive Appeal (sample appeal language is provided below). Please advise us if you do not succeed and wish assistance before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Example 1: Denial of service connection Please accept this as a Notice of Disagreement with your decision of [date], denying entitlement to service connection for lung cancer. My military service included duty and visitation in the Republic of Vietnam. In addition, I received the Vietnam Service Medal based on my naval [Air Force] service in the Republic of Vietnam. Under the Agent Orange Act, in conjunction with the VA DJUDICATION PROCEDURE MANUAL M21-1, Part III, para. 4.24g. (Change 76, June 1, 1999), exposure to Agent Orange should be conceded. If you are unable to resolve this Notice of Disagreement favorably, please process my case so that I may perfect my appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. Example 2: Denial of dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) Please accept this as a Notice of Disagreement with your decision of [date], denying entitlement to dependency and indemnity compensation. My late husband [wife] had military service that included duty and visitation in the Republic of Vietnam. In addition, my late husband [wife] received the Vietnam Service Medal based on his [her] naval [Air Force] service in the Republic of Vietnam. Under the Agent Orange Act, in conjunction with the VA ADJUDICATION PROCEDURE MANUAL M21-1, Part III, para. 4.24g. (Change 76, June 1, 1999), exposure to Agent Orange should be conceded. If you are unable to resolve this Notice of Disagreement favorably, please process my case so that I may perfect my appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. Example 3: Severance of Service Connection or DIC Please accept this as a Notice of Disagreement with your decision of [date], severing service connection [severing DIC benefits]. My [my husband/wife’s] military service included duty and visitation in the Republic of Vietnam. In addition, I [my husband/wife] received the Vietnam Service Medal based on my [his/her] naval [Air Force] service in the Republic of Vietnam. Under the Agent Orange Act, in conjunction with the VA ADJUDICATION PROCEDURE MANUAL M21-1, Part III, para. 4.24g. (Change 76, June 1, 1999), exposure to Agent Orange should be conceded. Thus, your decision of [date] did not properly constitute a finding of “clear and unmistakable error” of your earlier finding that service connection [DIC benefits] was [were] warranted. If you are unable to resolve this Notice of Disagreement favorably, please process my case so that I may perfect my appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals.
[Federal Register: June 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 112)] [Notices] [Page 32395-32407] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr12jn07-88] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Health Outcomes Not Associated With Exposure to Certain Herbicide Agents AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: As required by law, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hereby gives notice that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, under authority of the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Public Law 107-103, Section 201(d), has determined that a presumption of service connection is not warranted based on exposure to herbicides used in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era for the following health outcomes: Hepatobiliary cancers; oral, nasal, and pharyngeal cancer; bone and joint cancer; skin cancers (melanoma, basal, and squamous cell); breast cancer; female reproductive cancer (cervix, uterus, and ovary); testicular cancer; urinary bladder cancer; renal cancer; leukemia (other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)); abnormal sperm characteristics and infertility; spontaneous abortion; neonatal or infant death and stillbirth in offspring of exposed individuals; low birthweight in offspring of exposed individuals; neurobehavioral disorders (cognitive and neuropsychiatric); movement disorders including Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); chronic peripheral nervous system disorders; respiratory disorders; gastrointestinal, metabolic, and digestive disorders (changes in liver enzymes, lipid abnormalities, ulcers); immune system disorders (immune suppression, autoimmunity); circulatory disorders; amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis; endometriosis; effects on thyroid homeostasis; gastrointestinal tumors (esophagus, stomach, pancreas, colon, rectum; brain tumors; and any other condition for which the Secretary has not specifically determined a presumption of service connection is warranted. The Secretary's determinations regarding individual diseases are based on all available evidence in a 2004 report of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and prior NAS reports. This notice generally states specific information only with respect to significant additional studies that were first reviewed by NAS in its 2004 report. Information regarding additional relevant studies is stated in VA's prior notices following earlier NAS reports, and will not be repeated here. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda F. Ford, Consultant, Regulations Staff, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-7210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3 of the Agent Orange Act of 1991, Public Law 102-4, 105 Stat. 11, directed the Secretary to seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to review and summarize the scientific evidence concerning the association between exposure to herbicides used in support of military operations in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era and each disease suspected to be associated with such exposure. Congress mandated that NAS determine, to the extent possible: (1) Whether there is a statistical association between the suspect diseases and herbicide exposure, taking into account the strength of the scientific evidence and the appropriateness of the methods used to detect the association; (2) the increased risk of disease among individuals exposed to herbicides during service in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era; and (3) whether there is a plausible biological mechanism or other evidence of a causal relationship between herbicide exposure and the health outcome. Section 3 of Public Law 102-4 also required that NAS submit reports on its activities every two years (as measured from the date of the first report) for a ten-year period. Section 2 of Public Law 102-4, codified in pertinent part at 38 U.S.C. 1116(b) and (c), provides that whenever the Secretary determines, based on sound medical and scientific evidence, that a positive association (i.e. the credible evidence for the association is equal to or outweighs the credible evidence against the association) exists between exposure of humans to an herbicide agent (i.e. a chemical in an herbicide used in support of the United States and allied military operations in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era) and a disease, the Secretary will publish regulations establishing presumptive service connection for that disease. If the Secretary determines that a presumption of service connection is not warranted, he is to publish a notice of that determination, including an explanation of the scientific basis for that determination. The Secretary's determination must be based on consideration of the NAS reports and all other sound medical and scientific information and analysis available to the Secretary. Section 2 of the Agent Orange Act of 1991 provided that the Secretary's authority and duties under that section would expire 10 years after the first day of the fiscal year in which NAS transmitted its first report to VA. The first NAS report was transmitted to VA in July 1993, during the fiscal year that began on October 1, 1992. Accordingly, VA's authority under section 2 of the Agent Orange Act of 1991 expired on September 30, 2002. In December 2001, however, Congress enacted the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Public Law 107-103. Section 201(d) of that Act extended VA's authority under 38 U.S.C. 1116(b)-(d) through September 30, 2015. Although 38 U.S.C. 1116 does not define ``credible,'' it does instruct the Secretary to ``take into consideration whether the results [of any study] are statistically significant, are capable of replication, and withstand peer review.'' The Secretary reviews studies that report a positive relative risk and studies that report a negative relative risk of a particular health outcome. He then determines whether the weight of evidence supports a finding that there is or is not a positive association between herbicide exposure and the subsequent health outcome. The Secretary does this by taking into account the statistical significance, capability of replication, and whether that study will withstand peer review. Because of differences in statistical significance, confidence levels, control for confounding factors, bias, and other pertinent characteristics, some studies are more credible than others. The Secretary gives weight to more credible studies in evaluating the overall evidence concerning specific health outcomes. Chronology NAS issued its initial report, entitled ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Health Effects of Herbicides Used in Vietnam,'' (VAO) on July 27, 1993. The Secretary subsequently determined that a positive association exists between exposure to herbicides used in the Republic of Vietnam and the subsequent development of Hodgkin's disease, porphyria cutanea tarda, multiple [[Page 32396]] myeloma, and certain respiratory cancers. The Secretary also determined that there was no positive association between herbicide exposure and any other health outcome, other than chloracne, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas, for which presumptions already existed. A notice of the health outcomes that the Secretary determined were not associated with exposure to herbicides was published on January 4, 1994. (See 59 FR 341 (1994)). NAS issued its second report, entitled ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 1996'' (Update 1996), on March 14, 1996. The Secretary subsequently determined that a positive association exists between exposure to herbicides used in the Republic of Vietnam and the subsequent development of prostate cancer and acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy in exposed persons. The Secretary further determined that there was no positive association between herbicide exposure and any other condition, other than those for which presumptions already existed. A notice of the diseases that the Secretary determined were not associated with exposure to herbicide agents was published on August 8, 1996. (See 61 FR 41442 (1996)). NAS issued a third report, entitled ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 1998'' (Update 1998), on February 11, 1999. The focus of this update was new scientific studies published since the release of Update 1996 and updates of scientific studies previously reviewed. After NAS issued Update 1998, the Secretary determined that there was no positive association between herbicide exposure and any other condition, other than those for which presumptions already existed. A notice of the health outcomes that the Secretary determined were not associated with exposure to herbicide agents was published on November 2, 1999. (See 64 FR 59232 (1999)). At VA's request, NAS issued a special interim report, ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Herbicide/Dioxin Exposure and Type 2 Diabetes'' (VAO: Diabetes) on October 11, 2000. NAS concluded that: ``there is limited/ suggestive evidence of an association between exposure to the herbicides used in Vietnam or the contaminant dioxin and Type 2 diabetes.'' NAS based its conclusion on the conglomeration of scientific evidence, not one particular study. (VAO: Diabetes.) After considering all of the evidence, the Secretary determined that there is a positive association between exposure to herbicides and Type 2 diabetes and, therefore, a presumption of service connection was warranted. (See 66 FR 2376 (2001)). NAS issued a fourth report, entitled ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 2000'' (Update 2000), on April 19, 2001. The focus of this update was the new scientific studies published since the release of Update 1998 and updates of scientific studies previously reviewed. After NAS issued Update 2000, the Secretary determined that there was no positive association between herbicide exposure and any other condition, other than those for which presumptions already existed. A notice of the health outcomes that the Secretary determined were not associated with exposure to herbicide agents was published in June 24, 2002 (See 67 FR 42600 (2002)). NAS issued its fifth report, entitled ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 2002'' (Update 2002) on January 23, 2003. The focus of this update was the new scientific studies published since the release of Update 2000 and review of the studies previously reviewed along with the newest scientific evidence. The Secretary subsequently determined that a positive association exists between exposure to herbicides used in the Republic of Vietnam and the subsequent development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in exposed persons. After NAS issued Update 2002, the Secretary determined that there was no positive association between herbicide exposure and any other condition, other than those for which presumptions already existed. A notice of the health outcomes the Secretary determined were not associated with exposure to herbicide agents was published on May 20, 2003 (See 68 FR 27630 (2003)). Update 2004 NAS issued its sixth report entitled ``Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 2004'' (Update 2004) on March 4, 2005. Consistent with its prior reports, NAS in Update 2004 found that there was ``sufficient evidence of an association'' between herbicide exposure and five categories of diseases in veterans and ``limited/suggestive evidence'' of an association between herbicide exposure and six other categories of diseases in veterans. VA has previously established presumptions of service connection for each of these diseases. NAS, in Update 2004, categorized certain health outcomes to have ``inadequate/insufficient'' evidence to determine whether an association exists. This category is defined to mean that the available studies are of insufficient quality, consistency, or statistical power to permit a conclusion regarding the presence or absence of an association with herbicide exposure. Health outcomes that met the inadequate/insufficient category include: Hepatobiliary cancers; oral, nasal, and pharyngeal cancer; bone and joint cancer; skin cancers (melanoma, basal, and squamous cell); breast cancer; female reproductive system cancer (cervix, uterus, ovary); testicular cancer; urinary bladder cancer; renal cancer; leukemia (other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)); abnormal sperm characteristics and infertility; spontaneous abortion; neonatal or infant death and stillbirth in offspring of exposed individuals; low birthweight in offspring of exposed individuals; birth defects (other than spina bifida) in offspring of exposed individuals; childhood cancer (including acute myelogenous leukemia) in offspring of exposed individuals; neurobehavioral disorders (cognitive and neuropsychiatric); movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); chronic peripheral nervous system disorders; respiratory disorders; gastrointestinal, metabolic, and digestive disorders (changes in liver enzymes, lipid abnormalities, ulcers); immune system disorders (immune suppression, autoimmunity); circulatory disorders; AL amyloidosis; endometriosis; and effects of thyroid homeostasis. In this same report, NAS found two health outcomes that fell into the ``limited or suggestive evidence of no association category. These health outcomes were deemed consistent in not showing a positive association between them and any magnitude of exposure to herbicides. Those health outcomes that met the ``no association'' category were: gastrointestinal tumors (esophagus, stomach, pancreas, colon, rectum), and brain tumors. The Secretary's determinations regarding individual diseases are based on all available evidence in Update 2004 and prior NAS reports. This notice generally states specific information only with respect to significant additional studies that were first reviewed by NAS in Update 2004. Information regarding additional relevant studies has been stated in VA's prior notices following earlier NAS reports, and will not be repeated here. Hepatobiliary Cancers |